Hook comparison
Cluster recurring openings without treating one high estimate as a winning-ad verdict.
Find indexed Facebook and Meta-labelled creative records, inspect what changed across campaigns, and connect those observations with mobile app rankings and estimated market trends.
Start with 30 lifetime Free credits; usage varies by task.
Creative combinations are not unique ads. Content types may overlap and must not be summed.
The query, observation date and limitations travel together, so crawlers, researchers and customers see the same evidence.

Arrange a competitor's indexed records around four questions: what stops the scroll, what is offered, how the message is formatted, and which action closes it.
Cluster recurring openings without treating one high estimate as a winning-ad verdict.
Compare urgency, value framing and calls to action across a dated set.
Bring category rank and estimated downloads or revenue beside the creative timeline.
Align first-observed dates and format changes with category-rank and estimated market trends. Use the overlap to ask better questions, not to claim attribution.
“How did this app change its Facebook video hooks as its US category rank moved?”
Meta Ads Library remains the official platform source. AdMapix helps researchers compare indexed records across advertisers and connect them with app signals; coverage is not a guarantee of complete campaign history.
Meta Ads Library is the official source for Meta. AdMapix is a research layer for filtering indexed records and connecting observations with app and modeled market context.
No. AdMapix does not expose an advertiser's private spend or ROAS. Any estimated metric is labeled as modeled rather than platform-reported.
Not necessarily. Available history depends on the current index and filter combination, so absence from a result set should not be read as proof that an ad never ran.
Every public collection carries an observation date. AdMapix does not currently publish a verified hourly refresh SLA.